Social Media Reruns Are Ratings Gold The impact of reposting URLs on audience engagement on Twitter August 2014 www.rallyverse.com @rallyverse

Понравилась презентация – покажи это...

Слайд 0

Social Media Reruns Are Ratings Gold The impact of reposting URLs on audience engagement on Twitter August 2014 www.rallyverse.com @rallyverse

Слайд 1

In planning your social and content marketing strategy, we’re big believers in using your Evergreen Content as often as possible.

Слайд 2

That is, you should make sure your content strategy has room for your brand content that isn’t tied to a particular time or event: Product descriptions, explanatory videos, images, blog posts, how-to guides, etc.

Слайд 3

But how much evergreen content is too much evergreen content?

Слайд 4

That is, if you continue to post the same links to the same pieces of content, will your audience get bored and stop clicking?

Слайд 5

We pulled the data.

Слайд 6

Specifically, we looked at a single marketer with more than 1,000 followers on Twitter who posted 28 unique URLs between 1 and 7 times in June and July, 2014.

Слайд 7

That is, 8 URLs were posted once, two were posted twice, six were posted three times, and so forth.

Слайд 8

Looking at the data a slightly different way, you can see how many posts there were by order of post:

Слайд 9

As you can see, only three URLs made it all the way to elusive seventh spot, while five made it to the sixth (three of which went on to become seventh posts).

Слайд 10

With that data set, how did the average clicks per post change for each spot in the order of posting?

Слайд 11

That is, was there a downside to posting URLs more than once? And, as you posted more frequently, did your average clicks decline?

Слайд 12

Nope. Not at all.

Слайд 13

Слайд 14

In terms of average clicks, we don’t see a decline with each successive post. Not at all. Here’s another look:

Слайд 15

Слайд 16

While the data is noisy throughout, the overall trend line is actually positive.

Слайд 17

That is, Posting URLs more than once didn’t lead to fewer clicks per post — it led to more clicks per post.

Слайд 18

Maybe a few posts were outliers and were dragging the curve up and down? If you tease out each individual URLs clicks versus average by position, you see variance even on the individual URLs:

Слайд 19

Слайд 20

So what gives? Why are the results so inconsistent? Does post order matter at all?

Слайд 21

The short answer is, probably not, specifically because it’s very unlikely that you’re holding everything else equal when you share your owned content more than once.

Слайд 22

That is, the URLs in the data set may have been posted more than once, but they weren’t posted the same way. There are plenty of variables that can impact the performance of those posts:

Слайд 23

Tweet copy/ accompanying text, including use of hashtags Use of images Time of day, day of week of publishing Relevance of the topic at time of publishing

Слайд 24

Given the number of other factors that impact the click performance of a single Tweet, there doesn’t appear to be any downside to sharing a link to the same URL more than once.

Слайд 25

If the exact same Tweet was shared again and again, well, yes, we imagine the audience might get a bit bored.

Слайд 26

But, by varying the presentation of those URLs, and making sure that the copy is relevant to the topics that matter to the audience, marketers can earn clicks again and again — and deliver value to their audience.

Слайд 27

Rallyverse Confidential — Do Not Distribute 28 So, go ahead, share it again. And again. And one more time.

Слайд 28

Oh, and if you’re looking for a tool to help you manage all of that owned content and posting for you?

Слайд 29

Don’t worry: Rallyverse can help ?.

Слайд 30

Thank You info@rallyverse.com @rallyverse